Saturday, January 07, 2012
Mumbai by morn
Withdrawing from Facebook. Gently.
For some time now FB has been cheesing me off. Big time. They keep changing the look. They add in features I don't want and can't turn off. They remove features I had got used to.
I get strange invitations to weird games that I don't play. I get 'friended' by people I have no clue to. A friend's FB account got hacked. I read about features like Timeline that resurrect the dead past uninvited. And it doesn't get activated on my account. Dunno whether to rejoice or mourn.
If I comment on someone's pic I get inundated with everyone else's comments on it. It's like being at a wedding reception and having to listen to each guest wishing the couple. Gets old fast.
And may be that's what it is. I'm getting too old for this social media claptrap. Perhaps.
Or perhaps it's just FB that's stepping on my bunions. Besides, FB makes me lazy. Post a picture. Browse through some pictures of people who are only marginally relevant (at best) to my life. Read inane comments by all and sundry. Too passive by far.
So here's my resolve for 2012. Wean off FB. But breaking a habit, even one as sporadic as my FB habit is, is not easy. So, baby steps.
Step 1 - turn off notifications from FB on my mobile devices. Check. (Do I really need to know that someone somewhere commented something on someone else's photo of somebody altogether different sometime in the last two minutes? No.)
Step 2 - turn off email notifications. I will have to dive into FB's innards to achieve this and not altogether sure I want to do that. Will probably be simpler to set a filter in GMail to treat these as spam.
Step 3 - Stop visiting FB in my browser or my mobile apps. Check. I hardly ever do that nowadays anyway unless prompted by a notification. And see steps 1 and 2 on how to fix those.
Step 4 - Start blogging again. Haven't done so in a long, long while. And blogs are so last decade. But what the heck.
Finally, one day, delete my FB account. May, just may, come to pass.
Ironically, my blog posts will be posted to FB. For all those FB fanbois.
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Worth the (long) wait
Friday, March 26, 2010
BMC sponsored graffiti - an alternative
- All the surveyors surely have cell phones (that's a given, even the sweeper in my building has one).
- Mr Nilekani has oodles of tech expertise at his beck and call (and companies like TCS and Infosys are falling over themselves to get in on the UID project).
- The BMC has maps, surveys, records, whatever of the various wards in the cities and knows which buildings are where and which slums are where (of course it does, get real, that's its core).
- Establish an internal protocol for identifying each dwelling unit on the basis of the area, building, floor, flat/door number and make sure all your surveyors know how to use this. Give them laminated how-to sheets so they can refer to it in the field.
- Make a deal with the cellcos for a reduced rate on a special SMS scheme restricted to the cell phones of these surveyors and/or to/from a specified number.
- Tie that number up to a server and a database (companies do this all the time - SMS whoever if you want this offer, and so on).
- Get one of the aforementioned tech experts to write the required software (this is not rocket science, believe me - insurance companies, credit card companies, banks, contest companies do it all the time).
- When a surveyor lands up at a doorstep and does the survey, she sends an SMS to the server with the dwelling code (based on the internal protocol) and a simple DONE or NOT DONE message. If you want to get fancy and depending upon what it is that they are surveying, she can also send the results of the survey ("4 male adults, 2 female adults, 1.5 brats"), but that would be icing on the cake.
- The server records that in its database and the survey moves on.
- If a surveyor comes back fifteen days later and can't remember whether she surveyed flat 23, she sends an SMS to the server with the dwelling code and it checks its database and replies with a MEH, DONE or a DO IT NOW, YOU SILLY ASS message.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
My Name is NOT Khan
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Interesting twitularity stats
Saturday, December 19, 2009
iPhone delusions and the reality
Two, based purely on the review of the report and my own introspection about my iPhone usage, if I'm delusional, then that's okay by me. Whatever the shortcomings of the iPhone (and there are plenty - crappy business card exchange, mediocre camera by comparison with other phones, so-so battery life especially when doing non-phone stuff, no copy-and-paste till generation 2 came along), it is still one heck of a device. In the palm of my hand on a single device, I read books, play games, watch my favorite serials, listen to music, exchange messages with family, do maths, read the news, check my email, log my exercise, manage my appointments, track my music/movie/book collections, check the weather, use maps to find directions, take casual photos... oh, and make and receive phone calls. In my 49 years on this planet, this is the first device that lets me do all of those things pretty damn well and still fits in my pocket. Could it be better? Sure. And it probably will as time goes by and versions come along. But does it work for me right now? Sure does. Ok, so I'm delusional. Bite me.
Saturday, December 12, 2009
iPhone apps for the new addict
Friday, December 04, 2009
Ruminations 2 of 3: Adam Lambert - For Your Entertainment
The first time I heard Adam Lambert scream his heart out (and his head off) on American Idol, I sat up. To my mind, this was Robert Plant reborn. All he needed was his Jimmy Page alter-ego and we would have our very own Led Zep of the new century.
Alas, the music industry machine has grasped Adam in its maw, swallowed him and spat him out again as a cookie-cutter nondescript papster (yes, a popster who proffers pap is a papster).
On For Your Entertainment he dabbles in electronica, techno-pop, strange popping arrangements and generally forgettable gimmickry. (Case in point: Sure Fire Winners. Blech.) Occasionally, he goes completely over the top with strings and orchestra as in Soaked. Aerosmith or Guns n’Roses could pull that off. Adam sounds uncomfortable. Even the hard-working guitar solo in the middle of Sleepwalker can’t quite wake me up.
Adam shares writing credits on no fewer than four songs of the fourteen, so he really must get a fair share of the blame for this pedestrian run-of-the-mill affair.
It’s not that these are bad songs. From an artist with lesser potential, I would probably have rated this album higher. From Adam Lambert, however, this is a disappointment. I doubt that this album merits too many re-listens.
About the only song worthy of a re-listen is the one from the mega-disaster movie 2012, Time For Miracles. Mega-disaster this album, may not quite be, but it is time for a miracle to pull this chestnut out of the fire.
On my personal, arbitrary scale, I’ve rated none of the songs of the fourteen as five stars, one as four stars, most as three stars, and one poor unfortunate as two stars and a half.
Ruminations Interrupted by: Allison Iraheta - Just Like You
Another great album from a talent show finalist. I had intended to review Adam Lambert’s offering next, but I just got Allison’s album and on listening to it, I decided it merited a review way before Adam’s.
Her distinctive rocker husky growl and yell is put to good effect in this selection. Forget about her being 17 years old. She’s a natural who sings with the authority and experience of a thirty-seven year old - that’s a heck of a compliment. Reminds me of Joan Jett, Janis Joplin, among others.
Good, solid songs, not a turkey among them, but the standouts are Holiday (co-written by another talent show finalist, Dilana - we have a lot to be grateful for as far as these shows go) and Still Breathing. Honourable mentions to Friday I’ll Be Over You, Robot Love, Beat Me Up.
Allison plays to her strengths and doesn’t put a foot wrong. 21st century girl pop/rock with strong hints of classic rock chops.
On my personal, arbitrary scale, I’ve rated two songs of the thirteen as five stars, seven as four stars, two as four stars, one as three stars and half a star, and two as three stars.
Thursday, December 03, 2009
Joys of open source and customer satisfaction how-tos
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
Back in QuickSilver's arms - b57
Tuesday, December 01, 2009
Top 2.5 programs for a new Mac
Guidelines for Good Clear Writing - school notes rediscovered!
- Subject and verb always has to agree
- When dangling, watch your participles
- Do not use a foreign term when there is an adequate quid pro quo
- If you must use a foreign term, it is de rigor to spell it correctly
- It behooves the writer to avoid archaic expressions
- Do not use hyperbole; not one writer in a million can use it effectively
- Avoid cliches like the plague
- Mixed metaphors are a pain in the ass and oughta be thrown out the window
- Placing a comma between subject and predicate, is not correct
- Parenthetical words however should be enclosed in commas
- Consult the dictionary frequently to avoid mispelling
- Don't use tautological, repetitive or redundant statements
- Don't use tautological, repetitive or redundant statements
- Remember to never split an infinitive
- Puns are for children, not for readers who are groan
- The passive voice shouldn't be used
- Use the apostrophe in it's proper place and omit it when its not needed
- Don't use no double negatives
- Proofread carefully to see if you have any words out
- Hopefully, you will use words correctly, irregardless of how others use them
- Never use a long word when a diminutive one will do
- Avoid colloquial stuff
- No sentence fragments
- Remember to finish what you
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Quickfox Notes
Ruminations on Albums Three - Primo
A glorious showcase for this lady’s remarkable voice with some predictable song choices and one truly inspired, unlikely winner. For Ms Boyle to have recorded I Dreamed A Dream (from Lés Miserables) was a foregone conclusion since that was the song from the British talent show that launched her into YouTube stardom and brought goose bumps to millions, yours truly included.
Other chestnuts, while perfectly worthy renditions are nevertheless fairly predictable (though no less beautiful for that) when a voice like Ms Boyle’s is on display. Amazing Grace? Check. Cry Me A River? Check. How Great Thou Art? Check. Silent Night? Check.
Ms Boyle’s voice seems custom-fit to soar in cathedrals and echo in spires and the apparent preponderance of religious-themed songs or, at least, songs that sound religion-inspired on her album is not very surprising. A hint that Ms Boyle may be more than a one-trick pony, however is provided by three song choices on the album.
One is Daydream Believer, originally recorded by The Monkees as a chirpy, peppy uptempo pop song. Ms Boyle slows it down and gives it gravitas and depth. Another is Madonna’s You’ll See, again suitably measured in pace yet dramatic.
But the song that really blew me away was the unlikeliest choice of all: Wild Horses by the Rolling Stones. Susan Boyle doing Mick Jagger? Holy guacamole! She pulls it off and how! Wild Horses is a stand out bluesy number from the Stones’ Sticky Fingers album and Ms Boyle treats it with great respect. The delicate piano accompaniment and her wonderful voice, restrained at first, then soaring gloriously through the chorus makes this an instant and complete classic, a beautiful reinterpretation of a great song that transforms it into something wonderful and fresh.
On my personal, arbitrary scale, I’ve rated seven songs of the twelve as five stars, two as four stars and half a star, two as four stars, and one as three stars and half a star.
Ruminations on Albums Three
The contrasts could not be starker.
Watch this space for entirely subjective reviews of:
I Dreamed A Dream - Susan Boyle
For Your Entertainment - Adam Lambert
The Wall - Adam Lambert
NaNoWriMo Euphoria
Okay, skip the blood, sweat and tears (and the Earth, Wind and Fire), but make that t a capital one: Toil
And Fun with a capital F.
I'm now tuckered out from all that writing but two consecutive years of this puts me up there up Herman Melville, no? Probably not.
Watch this space.
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Euphemisms, PC and problems
The continuous trend towards the use of euphemisms in the service of political correctness has resulted in a dangerous blindness (visual challenge).
Let's take the current economic crises (there are more than one of them around) that are plaguing the world. The crises have some of their primary roots in the collapse of the US housing market and its consequent domino effect on the hundreds of financial institutions that were participating to some degree (often third- and fourth-hand) in this bubble.
This participation was encouraged and facilitated largely because either nobody understood what was happening or nobody gave a damn as long as their short-term goals were being met. Assuming a charitable mantle and discounting the effect of the second alternative, why did no one understand what was happening?
Because, financial markets and marketeers have proven themselves past masters of the euphemism.
"Subprime" is such a reassuring, gentle description. It has the merit of having "prime" in there, which conjures up such rosy optimism that the mind shuts off the prefix "sub". No one really cares that sub denotes "below" - it doesn't register. That's a classic euphemism. These weren't just subprime loans. They were loans that never had the remotest chance of being repaid.
Ninja loans, in fact. Doesn't that sound macho and action-oriented? Try (loans given to those with) No Income No Job as an Acronym. Ninja. Masters of spin.
Let's get back to calling a spade a bloody shovel. That way, we just might recognise it when someone clobbers us over the head with one.
Sunday, February 01, 2009
Federer - Nadal / Michelangelo - ?
Nadal is all power and fury, brute aggression, grimaces, grunts, mad dashes across the court. But one can't deny that he has the shots, he finds impossible angles and he can play the delicate drop shot as effectively as any. Federer is grace, artistry, elegance, magic - understated power and effortlessness.
Federer never looks like he's trying like mad, even when he is. Nadal always looks like he's trying like mad, even when he doesn't need to.
Nadal shares a name with a sublime artist - Raphael or Raffaello. Raphael was Michelangelo's contemporary and competitor, though he was eight years younger. The comparison is tempting, given the five year age gap between Federer and Nadal. Federer is undoubtedly Michelangelo, but Nadal is no Raphael.
Nadal is Jackson Pollock - insane energy, controlled chaos, relentless, pumped-up, tireless - "action painting". Federer is Michelangelo - sublime wizardry, poetry, adriotness, legerdemain, finesse - "beauty for the ages".
Jackson Pollock's "No. 5, 1948" became the world's most expensive painting in 2006, when it was sold privately to an undisclosed buyer for the sum of $140,000,000.
Michelangelo's frescos in the Sistine Chapel are a priceless gift to humanity.